Du er ikke logget ind
Beskrivelse
Many may have wondered, what is man to do with all the conflict that he inflicts upon himself? He wars against his fellow man, on account of difference in shade and color, and these wars and wounds inflicted by said wars linger and fester, until the original sin is forgotten, and all that remains is the pain and anguish of hatred.
This work seeks to give the reader a broad understanding over the phenomenon of ethnic conflict, the first section of the work covers conflicts of such a sort historically, citing three ancient civilizations, Egypt, Sumer, and Assyria. The second section covers through extensive quotation and critique the prevailing Eugenicist and White Supremacist thinkers of the early 20th century. And the third section presents the ideology of White Assimilation, an ideology designed to neuter the worst parts of White Supremacy, intended for those who wish to convince White Supremacists of the error of their position, and to tame the white ethnic nationalist tendency, that if not controlled leads more often than not to White Supremacy.
This work is thus intended for two main readers. The first being the reader who wishes to understand how the ideology of White Supremacy effectively operates. It is for this reader that the work is written in such a way as to reflect the general bias of the general White Supremacist and Ethnic Nationalist. The book is written in such a way that offensive and biased language and vocabulary can be found, this is intentional, so that the reader can understand the thought processes of the White Supremacist and Ethnic Nationalist.
The second reader that this work is written for is the one who wishes to arm him/herself with powerful arguments that are effective in instilling doubt and change of thought in the mind of the White Supremacist and Ethnic Nationalist. Logical arguments in most cases are ineffective, as White Supremacy is an ideology grounded and fueled by emotion, much as one could objectively view a religious ideology. Thus, the arguments used must be emotional in nature. This is the purpose of the 'White Assimilation' ideology that the work advocates for. This ideology effectively preserves the main foundation that fuels White Supremacy and Ethnic Nationalism however removes the more malignant parts that makes such ideologies so notorious. For example, Ethnic Nationalism holds that one need defend one's tribe against any rival tribes, of differing appearance. Whilst the ideology of White Assimilation will instead hold that rival tribes are potential friends, and even future tribe members, who can be 'assimilated.'
While Ethnic Nationalism will seek to instill fear of other ethnicities, say in terms of uneven birth rates, which Ethnic Nationalism will say is an attack on the ethnicity, White Assimilation holds that one can easily increase birth rates out of one's own volition, nothing is preventing one from doing so, no grand conspiracy; simply laziness and lack of will to have large families and sire great numbers of offspring. Such arguments use the ethnic tribalism that is so crucial to fueling White Supremacy and Ethnic Nationalism, and instead charge the focus, so that when one argues with an Ethnic Nationalist, the following argument of: "Having and caring for 7 children, will do more for the ethnicity than racist attacks against another ethnicity," will resonate much more with the person one is trying to sway, than arguing that the position that they hold is immoral, which they will simply reject as someone lying to them, in the hopes that they stop fighting for their ethnicity.