In the Desert Margins the Settlement Process in an Ancient South and East Arabia.

Ancient Arabia has promptly been pictured as a vast empty desert. Yet, for the last 40 years, by diggingout of the sand buried cities, archaeological researches deeply renewed this image. From the second half ofthe 1st millennium BC to the eve of Islam in East Arabia, and as early as the 8th century BC in South Arabia,the settlement process evolved into urban societies. This study aims at reviewing this process in South andEast Arabia, highlighting the environmental constraints, the geographical disparities and the responses ofthe human communities to ensure their subsistence and to provide for their needs. Evolution was endogenous, far from the main corridors of migrations and invasions. Influences fromthe periphery did not cause any prominent change in the remarkably stable communities of inner Arabia inantiquity. The settlement process and the way of life was primarily dictated by access to water sources andto the elaboration of ever-spreading irrigation systems. Beyond common traits, two models characterise the ancient settlement pattern on the arid margins ofeastern and southern Arabia. In South Arabia, the settlement model for the lowland valleys and highlandplateaus results from a long-term evolution of communities whose territorial roots go back to the BronzeAge. It grew out of major communal works to harness water. Into a territory of irrigated farmland, the south-Arabian town appeared as a central place. Settlements constituted networks spread across the valleys andthe plateaus. Each network was dominated by a main town, the centre of a sedentary tribe, the capital of akingdom. In East Arabia, the settlement pattern followed a different model which emerged in the last centuries BCalong the routes crossing the empty spaces of the steppe, in a nomadic environment. Each community spreadover no more than one, two or three settlements. These settlements never grew very large and the region wasnot urbanised to the same degree as in the southwest of the Arabian Peninsula. Permanent settlements wereplaces for exchanges and meetings, for craft productions, for worship, where the political elites resided,where the wealth from long-distance trading was gathered, and where surplus from the regional economywas held. Each town was isolated, like an island in an empty space. Dr Hdr Michel MoutonArchaeologist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNR S), MichelMouton has been director of the French archaeological expedition in Sharjahfrom 1991 to 1997 (excavations at Mleiha and al-Madam); director of the Frencharchaeological expedition in the Jawf-Hadramawt from 1995 to 2006 (excavationsat Qan', Makaynn, and surveys of the Yemen territory) and head of theproject 'Early Petra' from the National Agency for Research (2008-2012). From 2000 to 2002, he has been general secretary of the French Institute in theNear-East (IFPO, Damascus / Beirut / Amman), and deputy director in 2003. Atthe present time, he is director of the French Research Centre for Archaeologyand Social Sciences in the Arabian Peninsula (CEFAS, Jeddah / Sanaa). Dr Jrmie SchiettecatteArchaeologist and researcher at the French National Centre for Scientific Research(CNR S), in Paris, Jrmie Schiettecatte holds a PhD in Near-Eastern archaeologyfrom the Sorbonne University. He focuses on the study of the settlement processin arid lands. His current interests lay in the analysis of the evolution of settlementpatterns in the Arabian Peninsula from the Bronze Age to the Islamic period. Since 2000, he has been working in Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Yemen andSaudi Arabia. After having directed the archaeological mission in Hasi, Yemen(2008-2011), he is heading since 2011, together with A. al-Ghazzi, the FrenchSaudi Archaeological Project in al-Kharj (Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia).