- Bliv medlem
-
Du er ikke logget ind
Log ind Opret dig
Du er ikke logget ind
Beskrivelse
Focusing on the idea of genealogical affiliation (sampradaya), Kiyokazu Okita explores the interactions between the royal power and the priestly authority in eighteenth-century north India. He examines how the religious policies of Jaisingh II (1688-1743) of Jaipur influenced the self-representation of Gaudiya Vaisnavism, as articulated by Baladeva Vidyabhusana (ca. 1700-1793). GaudiyaVaia a avism centred around God Ka a a a was inaugurated by Caitanya (1486-1533) and quickly became one of the most influential Hindu devotional movements in early modern South Asia. In the increasingly volatile late Mughal period, Jaisingh II tried to establish the legitimacy of his kingship by resorting to a moral discourse. As part of this discourse, he demanded that religious traditions in his kingdom conform to what he conceived of as Brahmaa icaly normative. In this context the Gaua A ya school was forced to deal with their lack of clear genealogical affiliation, lack of an independent commentary on the BrahmasA tras, and their worship of GoddessRadha and Ka a a a, who, according to the Gaua A yas, were not married. Based on a study of Baladeva's BrahmasA tra commentary, Kiyokazu Okita analyses how the Gaua A yas responded to the king's demand.