- Bliv medlem
-
Du er ikke logget ind
Log ind Opret dig
Du er ikke logget ind
Beskrivelse
The main purpose of this book is to let people know what an atheist thinks, what his views are, what he thinks about religious arguments, and why he is not convinced by them. Several important themes are addressed in this book, religious, or not everyone should know these writings, they are not only a criticism of religions, but also of atheism itself.
Atheists are the most disunited minority in the universe, so I started what has become this book with a critical text on the foundations of atheism, an investigation into the reasons for this disunity, an atheist's text for atheists, words that struggle to demonstrate the true meaning and origin of atheism. For me, the atheist movement will only come out of puberty when there is a self-assertive critique capable of coherently constructing an atheist identity.
Most atheists these days are like eternal teenagers, they think that one dictionary definition is enough to instantly become a complete atheist. They consider themselves atheists and assume an incoherent brand of individualist rebels asserting a supposed absolute freedom; and, in this way, in the illusion of total freedom in atheism, without seeking the logical coherence of their ideas, they end up reproducing religious values, supernatural and incoherent beliefs. These kind of atheists don't study and are a disgrace.
An unbeliever must study religion to become a full atheist. A religious must also learn a little about atheism to maintain their faith. An army must always know its opponents to have a good strategy, otherwise it would be a long shot. If you don't like some subject, you shouldn't run away from these ideas, quite the contrary, you should learn a little to try to refute, disagree, or agree on a miserable point, anyway, otherwise, you're just someone superficial and ignorant who rejects everything just because you heard it around. Any discussion must respect logic, if you do not accept a statement you must counter it with another argument and not something subjective and baseless. It is necessary to be open to dialogue so as not to fall into the error of considering irrational everything that does not match our limits of perception.
